Raland J Brunson
v.
Sotomayor, Kagan & Jackson

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Raland's case against the 3 Supremes.
They adopted and supported the lower court decision that one cannot sue a Federal officer without getting special permission from the government.
A rule in Raland's favor would remove the immunity that they have enjoyed. They just can't let this happen.

We want to thank all those who put their hearts into the support of this campaign. A lot of work went into this. God bless all of you.

For free music written and recorded by Raland & Deron, click HERE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH

RALAND J. BRUNSON
                         Plaintiff,

v.

SONIA SOTOMAYOR, ELENA KAGAN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, in their
official capacities as Justices of the Supreme
Court of the United States, and JOHN and
JANE DOES 1-100,

                         Defendants.

  Case No.
  1:23-cv-00042-JCB



  Formerly:
  Utah State Court
  Case No. 230901367

  Currently:
  Utah Federal Court
  Judge Howard C. Nielson
  Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett

  • Raland J Brunson is currently suing 3 Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States to have them removed from office. It was originally filed in State Court and the Defendants moved it to Federal Court where it currently is.

  • Raland is suing the three who have the biggest track record of violating and disregarding their oath of office.

  • Here is the course that Deron took that taught him how to win in court without an attorney

  • Brunson Brothers Lawsuit History

  • Updates of this case will be posted below.

  • HISTORY

    March 17, 2023
      Raland filed the Complaint in the Utah State Court 2nd District Download Here

    April 12, 2023
      Defendants moved the case to the Federal Court

    April 19, 2023
      Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case Download Here

    May 15, 2023
    Raland filed the Opposition to their Motion to Dismiss the case. Download Here

    July 7, 2023
      Magistrate Judge tells our Chief Judge Howard C. Nielson to dismiss our case because (check this out) we didn't quote any decisions from other courts that would support the idea that you can sue the special people. In other words, the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Law of the land is not as strong as a decision that comes from the lower courts.

    July 17, 2023
      Raland files his opposition to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. Defendants have 14 days to respond.

    Aug 9, 2023
      Judge Nielson dismisses Raland's case claiming that Raland never filed it.

    Aug 10, 2023
      Raland contacts the clerk of the court, showing that he did in fact file the opposition.

    Aug 10, 2023
      The Court corrects the error and retracts their decision to dismiss the case.

    Aug 11, 2023
      Judge Howard C. Nielson decides to not hear the case. With the help of his brother Deron, Raland will now appeal the case to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, where three judges will decide if Judge Howard C. Nielson should hear the case. If the three judges decide against it, then Raland will appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Oct 24, 2023
      For a case to be appealed, I have to submit what is called an Opening Brief. Then the U.S. Attorneys will have the chance to challenge it. Here is the opening brief that was submitted. Download Here

    Nov 21, 2023
      The U.S. Attorneys challenged my Opening Brief, telling the Judges that I didn't get permission from the Federal Claims Court to file this lawsuit. Here is their Response that was submitted. Download Here

    Dec 11, 2023
      I replied to the U.S. Attorneys challenge, showing that the fact I have to get permission to sue the 3 Supremes violates my 1st Amendment Right. Here is my Reply that was submitted. Download Here

    February 8, 2024
      The appeal was denied. They just cannot let anyone remove the immunity that Federal Officers have enjoyed for so many years.